Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
--- Comment #35 from Matthew Miller <mat...@redhat.com> --- Should config.sample.php go in %doc instead of the config directory? I don't have a strong feeling here; I think we're inconsistent as a distro and I don't see a guideline offhand. Shouldn't PEAR5.php and PEAR-LICENSE be removed along with the other pear files? And, I'm sorry for not saying this sooner, but I was re-reading the bundled libraries rules and I think we need to either split out or go through the bundled-library-exception process for the remaining stuff under 3rdparty. (A lot of it may fall under "copylibs" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Copylibs) (I know you're working on jquery at bug #857992). This may have the benefit of making the License field less insane. :) On a less difficult note, maybe some of the text from http://owncloud.org/about/ could go in the description? I think it'd be nice for the description of the database subpackages to make clear that it's intentional for them to be empty. Alternately, they could contain doc files for configuration with that particular database? Not a review blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iEHy2iExv5&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
