Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888224

--- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dal...@gmail.com> ---
Hi Ken,
thank you.

> The first thing is that rpmlint caught an unnecessary link in 
> libshairport.so.2.0.0.

I have included your patch in the package and proposed it upstream too:
https://github.com/amejia1/libshairport/pull/3
If it will be included upstream i will remove it from package.

> The second thing is that the -devel subpackage contains two files that are 
> unnecessary.

Files removed.

> The third thing is that the Summary: field should be capitalized, so change 
> "emulates" to "Emulates".

Done.

> The fourth thing is that rpmlint complains about permissions on the 
> generate-tarball script.

Permissions changed.

> The fifth thing is that rpmlint complains using %define instead of %global.

Changed from %define to %global.


Hi Michael,

> It's possible to omit the Group tag, but if it's filled in, base libraries 
> enter group "System Environment/Libraries". Only the corresponding -devel 
> package enters group "Development/Libraries".

I have corrected groups membership.

> "Requires: libao-devel%{?_isa}" is missing, because the libshairport header 
> includes "ao" headers.

Requires added.

> is an ALAC decoder from 2005. What's the current legal situation here with 
> regard to Apple having published their codec as Open Source Software last 
> year?

I don't know about this, can anyone help?

New spec and srpm versions:
Spec URL: http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/libshairport.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/libshairport-1.2.1-2.20121218git16395d8.fc17.src.rpm
Successful koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4826859

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ixQrDAiVtD&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to