Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368

--- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> ---
For -2.2:

* Non-equality dependency
  - Please fix the line below, too.
-------------------------------------------------------
Requires:      rubygem(highline) "=>" 1.6.2
-------------------------------------------------------

* Unsatisfied dependency
  - As I said in the comment 15 (but "not on" should be
    read as "not only on", sorry), you have to modify
    gemspec file, too. Currently:
-------------------------------------------------------
[mtasaka@localhost ~]$ rpm -q rubygem-bicho
rubygem-bicho-0.0.6-2.2.fc.noarch
[mtasaka@localhost ~]$ ruby -e "require 'bicho'"
/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/dependency.rb:247:in `to_specs': Could not find
inifile (~> 0.4.1) amongst [RubyInline-3.11.0, ZenTest-4.6.2, abstract-1.0.0,
actionmailer-3.2.8, actionpack-3.2.8, ....
, zoom-0.4.1] (Gem::LoadError)
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:777:in `block in
activate_dependencies'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:766:in `each'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:766:in
`activate_dependencies'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:750:in `activate'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems.rb:212:in `rescue in try_activate'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems.rb:209:in `try_activate'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/custom_require.rb:59:in `rescue in
require'
    from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/custom_require.rb:35:in `require'
    from -e:1:in `<main>'
-------------------------------------------------------

* File list
  - Rakefile still seems to be installed in -doc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NFvjPs1leX&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to