Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #7) > >Wouldn't it be more future-proof to name the src.rpm "inih"? > > I understand, but I have to follow "Packaging Static Libraries". Or did I > misinterpret something? This wouldn't break the packaging guidelines, as far as I can evaluate. The "inih" source rpm doesn't result in a "inih" package, but in "inih-static" only. This way it can uniquely recognized as a static library package. The virtual "inih-devel" package is rather unneeded. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9ObaqBXHx0&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
