Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2010-04-26 14:55:14 EDT --- Does gcj support give no benefit in general, or is it simply not useful for this package? Because if it gives no benefit in general, you Java folks may wish to have the packaging committee update the guidelines to not say: GCJ AOT bits SHOULD be built and included in packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
