Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> ---
You could *really* run "rpmlint -i" on all the rpms as recommended and comment
on the output. ;o)
The rather generic name of the shared lib is potentially problematic, because
the file is stored in global search path for Python modules and therefore bears
a higher risk of causing a conflict. Blocking that path, even for any module
Python Standard Lib may want to include in the future, is not nice:
$ rpmls -p python-cpopen-1.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen-1.1-py2.7.egg-info
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.py
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.pyc
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.pyo
-> -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/createprocess.so
That this theory is not too far off can be seen with a repoquery, which shows
that there's at least one other python module that uses such a createprocess.so
but stores it in a subdir (which is much more nice):
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/*python*createprocess.so
vdsm-python-0:4.10.3-5.gitb005b54.fc19.x86_64
# repoquery -l vdsm-python|grep create
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/createprocess.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pYmF541q3U&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
