Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> --- You could *really* run "rpmlint -i" on all the rpms as recommended and comment on the output. ;o) The rather generic name of the shared lib is potentially problematic, because the file is stored in global search path for Python modules and therefore bears a higher risk of causing a conflict. Blocking that path, even for any module Python Standard Lib may want to include in the future, is not nice: $ rpmls -p python-cpopen-1.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen-1.1-py2.7.egg-info -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen.pyo -> -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/createprocess.so That this theory is not too far off can be seen with a repoquery, which shows that there's at least one other python module that uses such a createprocess.so but stores it in a subdir (which is much more nice): # repoquery --whatprovides /usr/*python*createprocess.so vdsm-python-0:4.10.3-5.gitb005b54.fc19.x86_64 # repoquery -l vdsm-python|grep create /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/createprocess.so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pYmF541q3U&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review