Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.com.au> --- All issues except rpath appear quite trivial to fix (and I've just done them in trunk) For the rpath issue: * The configure.ac is relatively standard, no real hacks like some other projects * I bootstrap the upstream releases on a Debian 6 (squeeze) system with the Debian autotools, that generates the configure script * according to the Debian wiki about rpath, there are slight differences in the way libtool works in this scenario because Fedora has lib64 and Debian had lib32 * I suspect that running autoreconf will generate another configure script that is more Fedora friendly - is it safe to do that from within a spec file? Have you seen this done elsewhere? http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue Can you also comment on the %doc issue? Should I just include it in one (or all?) of the %files sections? E.g. %files libs %doc COPYING %{_libdir}/libb2bua-*.so %{_libdir}/libdum-*.so %{_libdir}/librepro-*.so %{_libdir}/libresip-*.so %{_libdir}/libreTurnClient-*.so %{_libdir}/librutil-*.so %{_libdir}/libsipdial-*.so Or is there some way to tell it that file belongs in every package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R1UAv0QipJ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
