Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947155
Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> ---
Fedora review of mingw-gstreamer1-1.0.6-1.fc18.src.rpm 2013-04-01
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw-gstreamer1-1.0.6-1.fc19.src.rpm \
mingw32-gstreamer1-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \
mingw64-gstreamer1-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \
mingw32-gstreamer1-debuginfo-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \
mingw64-gstreamer1-debuginfo-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
mingw-gstreamer1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G
Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw-gstreamer1.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-02
mingw-gstreamer1.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Mon
Apr 02 2013 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxa...@o2.pl> - 1.0.6-1
mingw32-gstreamer1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer ->
G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw32-gstreamer1.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-02
mingw32-gstreamer1.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer1-1.0.6/COPYING
mingw64-gstreamer1.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer ->
G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
mingw64-gstreamer1.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-02
mingw64-gstreamer1.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-gstreamer1-1.0.6/COPYING
mingw32-gstreamer1-debuginfo.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-02
mingw32-gstreamer1-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
mingw64-gstreamer1-debuginfo.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-02
mingw64-gstreamer1-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 3 warnings.
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
native Fedora package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
d0797e51a420fca0beb973b9dcda586f gstreamer-1.0.6.tar.xz
d0797e51a420fca0beb973b9dcda586f Download/gstreamer-1.0.6.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
+ locale handling
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package doesn't bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Not applicable to MinGW packages.
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages must not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Just a small issue that rpmlint caught above: it should be 'Mon Apr 01', not
'Mon Apr 02' in the changelog.
Otherwise looks good, but please fix this before importing.
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BrRmRBNm8L&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
