Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950639
Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jhro...@redhat.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> ---
Thank you for the autoconf patch, I'll start using it in Fedora c-ares package.
Here is the correct link to the new package:
http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/c-ares19/c-ares19-1.9.1-4.fc18.2.src.rpm
Koji Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5242026
rpmlint output:
c-ares19.ppc64: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-12
c-ares19-debuginfo.ppc64: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-12
c-ares19-devel.ppc64: E: changelog-time-in-future 2013-04-12
c-ares19-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings.
The changelog in future is a simple specfile change that would be nice to get
done.
The no-documentation warning is OK, the man pages are removed on purpse.
* The package is named correctly given it's the 1.9 version
* Builds on all supported architectures (see the koji link)
* Smoke testing (a simple C program linked against c-ares19) worked fine
* Devel files are in the -devel package, file ownership seems sane
* Source tarballs' MD5 sums match:
** RPM - 389db4917a3b58c4ce4ebfe961fd84c4
** upstream - 389db4917a3b58c4ce4ebfe961fd84c4
Fix the date in the changelog and I'll approve :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W6C8QtS7DH&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
