Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927611

John Morris <j...@zultron.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |j...@zultron.com

--- Comment #4 from John Morris <j...@zultron.com> ---
Created attachment 735771
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=735771&action=edit
fedora-review results with reviewer notes

Here's the review.  These comments may also be found at the bottom of the
attached file.

Reviewer notes
----------------------------------------

[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.

Rpmlint:  pyode.x86_64: W: no-documentation

- No documentation

%doc should include AUTHORS ChangeLog LICENSE LICENSE-BSD README examples


----------
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

- Need Requires:  ode and Pyrex


----------
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python

- Python3 support: Infra is in specfile; does it work, and if so,
  should it be turned on?


----------
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

- Has this package been tested?  This %check script fails with a
  segfault, as does running the tests after install:

%check
export PYTHONPATH=build/lib.linux-%{_target_cpu}-%{python_version}
%{__python} tests/test_xode.py


----------
Rpmlint:  pyode.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified

- Main package missing Group: tag (though python3 package includes
  it).  I want this to be included in EPEL, where Group: is not
  optional.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XEDf4fSGy3&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to