Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> --- Looks like we made the guideline update too strict. What we wanted to avoid was packages uselessly adding --vendor (like --vendor=fedora). One *valid* purpose of .desktop vendor was to avoid conflicts (with qt4), which is precisely why I'm using it here. See http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-latest.html "To prevent that a desktop entry from one party inadvertently cancels out the desktop entry from another party because both happen to get the same desktop-file id it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure that all desktop-file ids start with a vendor prefix..." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nfzuLjARV5&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
