Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226

--- Comment #5 from David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> ---
Spec URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libmwaw.spec
SRPM URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libmwaw-0.1.7-1.fc18.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #3)
> Full review below. TODO items:
> 
> - MUST: The package must contain a comment explaining the multiple licensing
> breakdown [2]

Fair enough, added.

> 
> - SHOULD: Comments on status of patches (upstreamable, upstreamed?)

I would probably make a note if there were a Fedora-specific patch.

> 
> - OTHER: Upstream should be notified about incorrect FSF address of
> libmwaw-0.1.7/src/tools/zip/zip.cpp

Yes, I know. I have not been in a hurry about this one because the file is not
built in the package.

> 
> - OTHER: install docs in %{_docdir}/%{name} or as %doc? If in
> %{_docdir}/%{name}, why not just use 
>     %{_docdir}/%{name}/
> instead of
>     %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}
>     %{_docdir}/%{name}/html
> ?

I guess I am just accustomed to this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9l5lIlx1lw&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to