Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582

--- Comment #2 from Susi Lehtola <susi.leht...@iki.fi> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> License tag needs "and MIT" for /usr/share/psi/python/pep8.py

- Fixed.

> /usr/share/psi/python/pep8.py permissions wrong, should be executable?

I've fixed this in the upstream repo, the file shouldn't have a shebang.

> Need versioned dependencies in subpackages

Nope - since the package only contains static libraries, the devel package
doesn't require the base package.

The only relevant dependency is of the base package on -data, which is properly
versioned.

> Have you queried upstream about including a license text file?

Yes, I've filed a bug upstream about missing license headers and a license
file. I've also added a license text file in the upstream repo.

> Need to upstream Patch2, or document why it shouldn't be

I've already applied this upstream.

> Unless intending to support RHEL5:
>   remove BuildRoot tag
>   remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from %install section
>   remove %defattr
>   remove %clean section

Well, these don't hurt... but considering that the package anyway requires a
recent version of Boost, I've dropped these.

http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/psi4.spec
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/psi4-4.0-0.2.b4.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Mgr2XBb6Im&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to