Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589833 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarn...@gmail.com> 2010-05-08 03:14:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > If it's about license, I've got a little doubt. > In spec file there is: "GPL+ or Artistic", which is ok, and fits fedora > approved licenses. > However on the homepage there is "Perl (Artistic and GPL)", and it's about > "and" instead of "or". In LICENSE file included to package, there isn't > clearly > specified which naming is right, although they're both included and it's more > a > Notice than an error. This is covered in Licensing Guidelines[1] and more explicitly in Perl Packaging Guidelines[2]. It may seem odd, but it's correct - it's just one of those little quirks. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#License_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
