Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141
--- Comment #10 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <ser...@serjux.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > > * About "dpkg-devel": > > - Yes it is needed. It contains all the tools used by the debhelper > > wrappers like deb-substvars, deb-shlibs, etc. > > - The dpkg RPM split mirror the Debian package split -- I think w > > should stay that way. > > - Is there a standard way to declare -- "this is an rpmlint exception?" > > We need dpkg-devel before finish this review, I think , like others that > depend on this one. Hi, I made some confusion here , I though we don't have dpkg and pkg-devel , but we have it, the bug #648384 is just to updated dpkg from 1.15.x to 1.16.x . debhelper.noarch: E: devel-dependency dpkg-devel as point out in bug #591192#c1 by Miroslav Suchý This should be safe to ignore, but if you did not make review yet I would maybe suggest to keep Debian original name dpkg-dev. So just a misunderstood of fedora-review . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EGdxeOzXJs&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
