https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967517
Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |awill...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> ---
I'll take this, since I requested it...
So, question #1, why the Epoch? If you're thinking you need an epoch because
you want to obsolete a higher-versioned package, I don't think you do. A new
package with a different name can obsolete a higher-versioned old package. The
example at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
happens to demonstrate this (it has an un-epoch'ed bar replacing an epoch'ed
foo).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UdxSFqhg6T&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
