https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858127
--- Comment #11 from Björn Esser <bjoern.es...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8) > I suppose there may be other problems (wrong license tag, missing license > files), wich I have recently fixed in groovy package and which should be > backported. Checking the ~180 files with unknown license from source does not show or miss any license mentioned in spec-file. So this seems OK to me. (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9) > Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/groovy18.spec > SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/groovy18-1.8.9-2.fc18.src.rpm > > - packaged as a compatibility package re-reviewing shows objected compat-pkg issues are solved: * jar and pom are properly suffixed * no new issues So finally (flag was set already): APPROVED! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vl2JsKiazJ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
