Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591305 Stanislav Ochotnicky <socho...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |socho...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <socho...@redhat.com> 2010-05-13 08:28:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sure, I can submit the apache-commons-beanutils package for review too, if > you'd like? That would be great. Just don't forget to cc current owner of jakarta-commons-beanutils (ideally also add him as co-maintainer at the end of review if he doesn't mind). > (In reply to comment #2) > > (since apache-commons-loggins is already in > > rawhide)? Also you have old changelog included, it would probably be better > > to > > start from scratch. > > > > I have nothing against elderly changelogs, and it's not particularly long. I > know packages like Kernel and Eclipse trim them periodically because they get > absurdly long, but I thought it would be frowned upon to trim it for purely > aesthetic reasons... I wouldn't say it's aesthetic reason...You are creating a new package so if anyone is looking for history of the older package they can check its history. At least that's what I did with my commons packages: trimmed changelog, started counting from revision 1. But this is just my preference, AFAIK there is no policy forcing either way. I'll take this for review once beanutils is in rawhide (so maybe I'll review that first..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
