https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266

--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> ---
So I downloaded and built this; anyone who is still interested after nearly a
year certainly deserves a review.  However, I immediately noticed a few issues:

The package doesn't build with the mandatory compiler flags.  If that's a
regular autoconf-generated script (and it sure looks like it is), why not use
the usual %configure macro to call it, so that everything gets set and passed
correctly?

Did you look at the rpmlint output at all?  I see a bunch of stuff which is
trivially fixable and some other stuff I don't understand at all.

  plink-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
This comes from not building with the mandatory compiler flags.  (-g isn't
there, so no debug info was compiled in.)

  plink.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/plink.1.gz 28: 
   warning: numeric expression expected (got a tab character)
A whole bunch of these which I don't understand.  Generally you should not
compress manpages; rpm will do it automatically, and will use the proper
compression system if we decide to switch from gzip in the future.

  plink.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C whole genome association analysis 
   toolset
Should capitalize the summary.

  plink.src:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
The configure script should be called via %configure if it is
autoconf-generated.

  plink.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 1)
Please be consistent with indentation.

  plink.src: W: file-size-mismatch plink-1.07-src.zip = 692437, 
   http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/dist/plink-1.07-src.zip = 2257297
So, what happened here?  The file in the src.rpm is pretty much completely
different than what's at the upstream web site.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QKuXXTosyT&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to