Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591947 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurt...@redhat.com> 2010-05-14 01:59:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Alexander, > > I found that many -javadoc packages don't create a symbolic link from > %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} to %{_javadocdir}/%{name}. Java package > guideline also don't mention that, are they all need fixing? Having unversioned javadoc directory is good to have for some commonly used packages like apache-commons-io (a number of developers should be using this javadocs). But there is no point having things like that for packages like the maven-jar-plugin. Virtually noone except a few maven developers will be reading that so we are not causing any inconvenience. For me this should be up to the packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
