Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591298 Stanislav Ochotnicky <socho...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <socho...@redhat.com> 2010-05-14 03:19:58 EDT --- >If no package in Fedora needs the legacy pom, is this still necessary? If > "org.apache.commons" if the right way, I'd rather just do that. Is it possible to find out in some easy way? For my future reference :-) You are right though, it's good to avoid polluting the spec file if it's possible. When I did this in my specs I added a big comment stating why it's there...But this really is not a show-stopper. Since we are doing this in rawhide, we will have time to find out if something doesn't work. Thanks for explaining those OSGi bundles and your changes. Modified spec is good. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
