Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C 
software

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579

           Summary: Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code
                    analysis of C software
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: msra...@gmail.com
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://tpath3.dnsalias.net/openproofs/frama-c.spec
SRPM URL: http://tpath3.dnsalias.net/openproofs/frama-c-1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:Frama-C is a suite of tools dedicated to the analysis of the
source
code of software written in C.

Frama-C gathers several static analysis techniques in a single
collaborative framework. The collaborative approach of Frama-C allows
static analyzers to build upon the results already computed by other
analyzers in the framework. Thanks to this approach, Frama-C provides
sophisticated tools, such as a slicer and dependency analysis.

There are 6 warnings.  3 deal with the QPL License with exceptions.  3 deal
with unstripped binaries.  At least one of the binaries is a loadable library
and can not be stripped.  I suspect the other two are also. 

This is an attempt to move the maintenance of this package from  Alan Dunn, and
is done at his request.  This replaces bug 564520 and the people who are
interested should read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564520 for
more information.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to