https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> ---
I think it might be better to call the package "Elm".

At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
in the Haskell Guidelines.  (Failing that probably need to replace
%{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tOX2UNEZg6&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to