https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982748
Bug ID: 982748 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Warnings - Test for warnings and the lack of them Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Test-Warnings/branches/fedora/perl-Test-Warnings.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Test-Warnings/perl-Test-Warnings-0.006-2.fc20.src.rpm Description: If you've ever tried to use Test::NoWarnings to confirm there are no warnings generated by your tests, combined with the convenience of done_testing to not have to declare a test count, you'll have discovered that these two features do not play well together, as the test count will be calculated before the warnings test is run, resulting in a TAP error (see examples/test_nowarnings.pl in this distribution for a demonstration). This module is intended to be used as a drop-in replacement for Test::NoWarnings: it also adds an extra test, but runs this test before done_testing calculates the test count, rather than after. It does this by hooking into done_testing as well as via an END block. You can declare a plan, or not, and things will still Just Work. It is actually equivalent to: use Test::NoWarnings 1.04 ':early'; as warnings are still printed normally as they occur. You are safe, and enthusiastically encouraged, to perform a global search-replace of the above with use Test::Warnings; whether or not your tests have a plan. Fedora Account System Username: pghmcfc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wX0qavtrDE&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review