https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983784
--- Comment #4 from mray...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Initial view: > > Hey guy, I'm wondering why you write a spec like a makefile.in? > > Can you provide a "easy-to-read" spec? > > That means ,drop all %define macros OK? And your spec doesn't match our > guideline. > > Besides, please remove Vendor and Packager tag, we don't need it. Thanks for your response. I agree I did have a lot going on there with %define's. I'm just working through this now for the first time so please bear with me. I've gone ahead and updated (hopefully more conforming) SPEC and SRPM are at the same url's as before. Spec URL:http://www.mockturtlesolutions.com/RPMS/myrtle.spec SRPM URL:http://www.mockturtlesolutions.com/RPMS/myrtle-1.8-fc18.src.rpm P.S. Are their standard Fedora RPM macros (similar to %{_bindir}) that I can/should be using for the icon/hicolor and desktop directories and to do the gtk-update-icon-cache? Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=B79Xk3VIjM&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
