https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251
Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Dan Callaghan from comment #3) > Well, I cleaned out some comments/whitespace because I figured I would be > maintaining the spec by hand, since cabal-rpm got the description, summary, > and BuildRequires wrong. Is there a better way? I assume you mean "xml2-devel"? Yeah I am planning to improve that. Eventually I would also like cabal-rpm to support updating of packages but that is a bit more complicated. For now you can use cabal-rpm-diff (cblrpm-diff) to compare your spec file to what cblrpm would generate. So yeah it is a manual process - I usually use a merge tool to merge changes from .spec.cblrpm to .spec. But removing the comments just adds to the diff. :) We generally try to stay close to the cblrpm output. Suggestions for improving the Summary and Description output are welcome - in this case not sure how cblrpm could do better. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AacQohXsOV&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review