https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988890
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> --- RPMLINT VALUES: $ rpmlint rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap.spec rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.0.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-doc-2.0.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. REASON FOR OLDER VERSION OF GEM: This package is for a couple of OpenShift packages that need this version. Upstream will not be able to update and test to the newer version of this gem for several months. There have been no security advisories about this gem that require the newer versions. REASON FOR THE VENDOR DIRECTORY: We are following the footsteps of the rubygem-bootstrap-sass review[1]. That review consulted with the ruby-sig and the consensus was to leave the bundled javascript in until there are approved javascript guidelines.[2] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982679 [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2013-July/001389.html LICENSE: The License is already in newer versions of the gem. When we are able to update to a newer version, we will use Upstreams file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cwCKMKh1xZ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
