https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
--- Comment #5 from František Dvořák <val...@civ.zcu.cz> --- I see, it is not re-licensed under ASL (and there is no reason to). The other license should be mentioned. :-) The original project claims they have MIT-like license, but its variant is identical to ISC (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/trio/). Should we use "ASL 2.0 and MIT" instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xjRuAygQIG&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
