https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #48 from Al Stone <a...@redhat.com> --- A little update: the patch I submitted to clarify licensing was not accepted by upstream; they are very reluctant to include a separate file because of their dual licensing (they don't want anyone confused, hence they make it explicit in each source file). However, I was assured that in the next release (due within a week), all of the UNKNOWNs found by licensecheck before should be fixed and have the same header as all of the other source code files. Makefiles and scripts may or may not have them by them; I'm investigating another patch to correct those. So, where does that leave us? Is the review completed and the package acceptable? Or do we need to wait until we get the next version from upstream? Thanks again for all the help! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TeHTuG5FAf&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
