Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #6 from Rafael Aquini <aqu...@linux.com> 2010-05-23 22:15:53 EDT --- David, Since a picture is a lot more valuable than a thousand words, take this comment as an example, please. Spec URL: http://aquini.tchesoft.com/RPMS/sshdfilter/sshdfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://aquini.tchesoft.com/RPMS/sshdfilter/sshdfilter-1.5.5-2.fc12.src.rpm MD5 sum: 8f0422d6150841ba08017faa3dcc1a52 sshdfilter.spec ea2d0b58375debb7d337f2930d33dc2d sshdfilter-1.5.5-2.fc12.src.rpm As you will see, I stripped off from this Spec your former %post and %postun sections. Well, in plain words there is no simple and safe way to have such modifications done in those config files. What I'm trying to mean is there is no simple way to predict how those files will be found when an user tries to install, update or remove sshdfilter package. Even if we could find out how to get this task accomplished on its whole complexity, it will represent a lot of (complex) work to those two RPM sections. And for the worst, your package would be messing with other RPMs belongings (that's not so good...). So, said that my suggestion is: do not change those files and instruct users, through documentation, to do just after sshdfilter installation instead. Of course all of that I've presented are just suggestions that you can consider or not. Best regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
