Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #16 from Chen Lei <supercyp...@gmail.com> 2010-05-25 09:33:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > LGPLv2+ + Public domain = LGPLv2+, because LGPLv2+ contains all limitation > > Public domain > > > > Yesterday, someone confirmed this with spot. > A couple of months ago I got different information about this. But if the > additional "Public Domain" tags can now be omitted, then that's fine. Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means the material is not copyrighted and no license is needed. If LPGL files compile with some others common license such as MIT BSD, the license is also LPGL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
