https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> --- (In reply to Michal Srb from comment #4) > I have a suggestion here. I would rename the package to "spring-batch". > "springframework-batch" is not wrong, but we already have packages like > spring-ldap, now spring-retry. These are standalone libraries that can be > easily used outside of spring framework. However, if you don't agree it's > not really a deal breaker for me. I will do the review anyway. for me it is not a problem, but the so called to make sure that users do not confuse it with the packages related to spring(rts) http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/spring.git/ i have already similar problem with hibernate packages, user confused this one with pm-hibernate (pm-utils) regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
