https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021721
--- Comment #10 from Erik Johnson <e...@saltstack.com> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9) > Group: → not necessary > At all, or is it still necessary for EPEL5? > cd $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{_realname}-%{version} → not necessary > Ah, so there is an implicit cd to the directory where the source was unpacked (at least, in single-source builds)? > Since you are also upstream for salttesting (judging by the email address): > don't use bare 'except:' ever: it catches ^C. Not necessary, but it would be > nice to fix. > Yeah, I haven't done any work with the test framework per se, I do most of my work on salt proper. I did however just submit a pull request to get those bare excepts changed (at least temporarily) to "except Exception". > And also, can you include a license file upstream? > I brought up this point with the guy that manages the salt-testing project, and by the end of this week we expect a 0.5.2 release to be cut, which will include a LICENSE file. > setup.py says Python 3 is alpha state... Are there any plans for full > support? (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default). > > Looks nice and clear. Full support for Python 3 is expected in the next several months, M2Crypto is still required to run salt and is the only real blocker, until we can move to ZeroMQ 4 which includes its own crypto. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review