https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
| |m
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
> Hi Bjorn, what should I do now?
> Can I only package headers?
I'm not sure, but there was an attempt to do so:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
Unfortunately, the review was never completed, because there was no need
anymore for it as a dependency for another package.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
> Hi all, before update this review, I want to know which name is better?
> clens(tarball name) or libclens(more like a library)?
There's no unique guideline for, just that:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming
You might use the tarball name, but to see directly that it is a library, you
might use the "lib" prefix. It is your choice.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
