https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024136
--- Comment #27 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
It's only a misunderstanding. If there hasn't been an update, the original
Spec/SRPM links are still valid. After plenty of comments in the ticket, that's
not so obvious anymore, so reposting them doesn't hurt (albeit is not
mandatory).
[...]
In the %description:
> By default this plugin looks for templates in ~/Templates.
> You can change this by editing the source.
The second sentence is misleading. The installed plugin _is_ a source file,
since it's written in Python. However, editing is not really an option for RPM
package users, because the next update would overwrite the changes.
The plugin could evaluate XDG_TEMPLATES_DIR.
> # python3 is pulled from gedit dependencies, so no need to install
> explicitly
> Requires: gedit%{?_isa}
Only one of gedit's current plugins depends on Python 3. Gedit itself does not.
Optimising dependencies is frowned upon. _This_ particular plugin requires
Python 3, so there ought to be a dependency.
> $ rpmls -p gedit-template-0.0.2-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/template.plugin
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/template.py
> drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/gedit-template-0.0.2
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/gedit-template-0.0.2/LICENSE
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/gedit-template-0.0.2/README
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
