https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972431



--- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14)
> I think all issues are fixed, time to approve.

There still are arch/multilib-related issues. Try building the srpm for i386
and x86_64, unpackage the resulting binary rpms into separate directories and
compare them.

Here is one example (There are several more):

diff -Naur i386/usr/share/airtsp/CMake/airtsp-config.cmake
x86_64/usr/share/airtsp/CMake/airtsp-config.cmake
--- i386/usr/share/airtsp/CMake/airtsp-config.cmake     2013-11-04
06:16:02.000000000 +0100
+++ x86_64/usr/share/airtsp/CMake/airtsp-config.cmake   2013-11-04
06:01:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 set (AIRTSP_VERSION "1.01.1")
 set (AIRTSP_BINARY_DIRS "/usr/bin")
 set (AIRTSP_INCLUDE_DIRS "/usr/include")
-set (AIRTSP_LIBRARY_DIRS "/usr/lib")
+set (AIRTSP_LIBRARY_DIRS "/usr/lib64")

 # Library dependencies for AirTSP (contains definitions for the AirTSP   
 # IMPORTED targets)


Additionally, the doc-package is having doxygen timestamping issues, which
causes the doc package to be built non-deterministically:

# diff -Naur
i386/usr/share/doc/airtsp-doc/html/AirlineScheduleTestSuite_8cpp.html
x86_64/usr/share/doc/airtsp-doc/html/AirlineScheduleTestSuite_8cpp.html
--- i386/usr/share/doc/airtsp-doc/html/AirlineScheduleTestSuite_8cpp.html      
2013-11-04 06:16:05.000000000 +0100
+++ x86_64/usr/share/doc/airtsp-doc/html/AirlineScheduleTestSuite_8cpp.html    
2013-11-04 06:01:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 </div><!-- contents -->
 </div><!-- doc-content -->

-               <li class="footer">Generated on Mon Nov 4 2013 06:16:05 for
AirTSP by
+               <li class="footer">Generated on Mon Nov 4 2013 06:01:36 for
AirTSP by
                  <a href="http://www.doxygen.org/index.html";>
                        <img class="footer" src="doxygen.png"
alt="doxygen"/></a>
                  1.8.5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to