https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #11 from Thibault North <thibault.no...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10) > (In reply to Thibault North from comment #9) > > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/blosc/blosc_extension.so 0775L > > > It looks like .so files in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ also are 0775. > > Read again... Excuse me, but this kind of comment is not helpful (nor kind). How much does it cost to write 755 != 775 instead and save time to everyone? Also, it would be nice if you could comment on the private-shared-object-provides thing. Thank you. SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/rev/python-blosc-1.1-4.fc19.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/rev/python-blosc.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
