https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016258
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák <val...@civ.zcu.cz> --- > > Issues: > ======= > [ ]: Possible license field issue. Two of the files (domnode-expat.c and > stack.c) are MIT licensed, so I think MIT should be included in the license > field as well. Additionally, for the GPL code, I think it should be listed > as > LGPLv2 (vice LGPLv2+) - I did not see the "or later version" listed > somewhere, > unless I missed it. Nice catch! The license is LGPLv2 of course (and the same is for the native log4c package). Due to the MIT license files: it looks like domnode-expat.c is relicensed under the license of log4c (there is added text "see COPYING"), but stack.c doesn't have this text added. Maybe it's just forgotten? I'm currently upstream maintainer (although not the original author), so we can consider upstream noticed. ;-) I guess the best will be just to use "LGPLv2 and MIT" here? (According to the current source files?) New version: Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-log4c-1.2.4-2/mingw-log4c.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-log4c-1.2.4-2/mingw-log4c-1.2.4-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
