https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #17 from Terje Røsten <terje...@phys.ntnu.no> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #16) > > yes I know but better be safe than sorry ;) > > better to abide by the recommended guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > > "... Packages must not contain unnecessary explicit Requires on libraries." > that's a must, not a should, mind you. :) Let me explain why: if e.g qt gets renamed to e.g qt5 you are in trouble, while with no explicit deps you are fine. >> Build is not verbose, not possible to verify build flags. > What do you mean 'not verbose'? See e.g the line in logs: Building CXX object src3party/qxt/CMakeFiles/qxt.dir/qxtglobal.cpp.o There is no information here about build flags used. Change make %{?_smp_mflags} -C %{_target_platform} to make %{?_smp_mflags} -C %{_target_platform} VERBOSE=1 to see the difference. You will then see an other problem, correct build flags are not used. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
