https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035897

            Bug ID: 1035897
           Summary: Review Request: open-sans-fonts - a humanist
                    sans-serif typeface
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
          Reporter: pvobo...@redhat.com
        QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://pvoborni.fedorapeople.org/open-sans-fonts/open-sans-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pvoborni.fedorapeople.org/open-sans-fonts/open-sans-fonts-1.10-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: Open Sans is a humanist sans serif typeface designed by Steve
Matteson, Type Director of Ascender Corp. This version contains the complete
897 character set, which includes the standard ISO Latin 1, Latin CE, Greek and
Cyrillic character sets. Open Sans was designed with an upright stress, open
forms and a neutral, yet friendly appearance. It was optimized for print, web,
and mobile interfaces, and has excellent legibility characteristics in its
letter forms.
Fedora Account System Username: pvoborni
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6237798

This is the first package I'm submitting to Fedora. Thus I'm seeking a sponsor.

Additional info: I could not find a proper upstream. Since the font was
commisioned by Google, the source archive was created from a one downloaded
from Google Fonts web service.

During rpm build, font's embed permission is set to 'installable' according to
discussion on fedora-devel:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/192518.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to