https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031318

Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> ---
Thanks for addressing my questions. I still think the package should have a
.desktop file, but I understand your reasoning for not doing shipping one at
this time. Based on your responses, I don't see any remaining blockers, so
package APPROVED.


> > - Please filter /usr/bin/env from Provides.
> - Well, I don't see "Provides" has /usr/bin/env. Would you check this?

I'm wrong, sorry. It's in Requires rather than Provides.


> > - What is the GPG file for? It seems to me that you could remove it from the
> >   binary packages, or else document the reason for its existence in the 
> > spec.
> 
> - Well, I don't think we have to dare to remove this file...

It just seems odd that Fedora ships a file without anyone understanding the
purpose for doing so, particularly something security-related like a GPG key. I
can't find a reason myself, so I'll defer to you as the package's maintainer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to