https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #21 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
observed issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1011705-datanucleus-
core/licensecheck.txt
see src/java/org/datanucleus/util/Base64.java
/**********************************************************************
//Copyright 2003-2009 Christian d'Heureuse, Inventec Informatik AG, Zurich,
Switzerland
//www.source-code.biz, www.inventec.ch/chdh
//
//This module is multi-licensed and may be used under the terms
//of any of the following licenses:
//
//EPL, Eclipse Public License, http://www.eclipse.org/legal
//LGPL, GNU Lesser General Public License,
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html
//AL, Apache License, http://www.apache.org/licenses
//BSD, BSD License, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
//
//Please contact the author if you need another license.
//This module is provided "as is", without warranties of any kind.
[?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
***********
see src/java/org/datanucleus/util/Base64.java
***********
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
