Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> 2010-06-02 05:32:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Ping? Pong. Thanks for the ping!! There are some rpmlint warnings (just posting the relevant ones, which are not ignorable): python-pebl.src:56: W: macro-in-comment %check python-pebl.src:57: W: macro-in-comment %{__python} -> ignorable, because they remind you to add %check again python-pebl.src:61: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} python-pebl.src:62: W: macro-in-comment %{python_sitelib} -> Better prefix an %, so this won't show up anymore python-pebl.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.so _network.so()(64bit) python-pebl.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.so _cpd.so()(64bit) -> A solution for this is e.g. in bug 537983 comment 27. python-pebl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.so python-pebl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.so This is a bit strange... Do you have a debuginfo package? I'm wondering, why there isn't one here... There is /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/test/ Is that needed at runtime? If not, it would be nice, if you'd delete that (or ask upstream to do so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
