https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Can upstream fix the requires or let relevant package's maintainer round up > the version? It's wishful naive dreamery to expect upstreams doing so. > 1. According to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips?rd=PackagingTips/Perl#ExtUtils:: > MakeMaker > > You can use DESTDIR as PERL_INSTALL_ROOT. Many roads lead to Rome ... CAN != MUST. > 2. Also according to the same URL above, remove > > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; This line does not do any harm. Keeping it is still useful on many occasions and prevents bad surprises. > Others are fine. > > 3. No license file. There is *no* requirement for a package to ship a detached license file. The license of the package can be found inlined at the bottom of: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/AJUNG/Crypt-X509-0.51/lib/Crypt/X509.pm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
