https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751



--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
Great!

> [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
>      Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.3/site-
>      packages/__pycache__(python3-setuptools, python3-libs)

What this item on the list means is: The fedora-review tool found directories
in the package, which are owned by other packages already. That refers to the
following part of the guidelines:

 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package

>      -- Owns it's own files in cited directories,

It should _not_ own /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/__pycache__ because that
one belongs into python3-libs already.

Co-ownership of directories can become a problem, if one package messes up the
file access permissions, for example. That's why the guidelines still try to
reduce co-ownership to the exceptional cases:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function

[...]

Not related to the Review Guidelines, but to: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Examples_of_good_package_summaries

> Summary:        A pure python bbcode parser and formatter

My alternative suggestion that also eliminates the lower-case spelling of
everything:

  Summary: BBCode parser and formatter written in Python

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to