https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036393
--- Comment #3 from Matej Stuchlik <mstuc...@redhat.com> ---
- The License field should use short license name [0], so in this case it
should prolly be "ASL 2.0".
- Maybe I'm missing something, but why do you list all the directories and
*.py[co] files in %files instead of just using:
%{python3_sitelib}/openid/
%{python3_sitelib}/python3_openid-%{version}-py3.*.egg-info
[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
