https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589

Jamie Nguyen <jamieli...@fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
                   |                            |g



--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen <jamieli...@fedoraproject.org> ---
I don't mean to barge in uninvited, but here is my take on the package. Feel
free to ignore my Spec. (There are also lots of whitespace changes, sorry.)

NB: This is unlikely to be available on anything other than F21 and above.
closure-compiler requires guava. F20 has too old a version of guava, and EL6 is
missing several BuildRequires for guava. Since this is part of the long and
winding jQuery dependency tree, we won't see jQuery in F20/F19/EL6 unless some
magic happens.

I decided to package from NPM as it contains everything we need. I also decided
to maintain the names and locations of files in the upstream software to avoid
end-user confusion.

Having recently introduced a package called js-json, containing the most
popular(?) json JS library, I thought the most appropriate name would be
js-zlib, containing the most popular(?) zlib library.


Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/gruntjs/js-zlib.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/gruntjs/SRPMS/js-zlib-0.2.0-1.fc21.src.rpm

* Thu Mar 13 2014 Jamie Nguyen <jamieli...@fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.0-1
- update to upstream release 0.2.0
- rename to js-zlib and nodejs-zlibjs
- install to {_jsdir}
- maintain filenames and locations that upstream are using
- use patch instead of sed
- include additional documentation in nodejs-zlibjs package

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to