https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069259



--- Comment #11 from Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> ---
> No license file seems to be included in the package
> [!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
>      other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
>      Guidelines.
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
>      "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)",
>      "GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unknown or generated". 61 files
>      have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
>      /home/petersen/pkgreview/1069259-ndoutils/licensecheck.txt
> [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
>      from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> Some of the source files say GPLv2 but no license file included.

I've included a GPLv2 license text file from gnu.org, I will contact upstream
to include it.

Regarding the files that are Apache (2.0), the licensing guidelines [1] state
that the ASL 2.0 license is not compatible with GPLv2. The only header file
that is licensed like that is the Nagios header that is required for building
the broker module.
Also Nagios, from where the header comes from [2], contains the header in
question with ASL 2.0 but has only GPLv2 as the license in the spec file [2].

I'm not sure this poses a problem on the resulting shared object; so I'm
lifting FE-LEGAL for it.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses
[2] http://sourceforge.net/p/nagios/nagioscore/ci/master/tree/lib/pqueue.c
[3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/nagios.git/tree/nagios.spec#n9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to