Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841 --- Comment #34 from Chen Lei <supercyp...@gmail.com> 2010-06-14 23:10:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > I am very sorry about not helping out in this review but only critizising. > However there is still one thing I'd like to see changed: The wicd binary > package should IMO be renamed to wicd-pm-utils or alike to avoid confusion. It > is perfectly fine to have a %{name}.src.rpm that does not create a > %{name}.%{arch}rpm but only subpackages with different names. Is it acceptable to merge wicd-common into wicd package until rpm allow noarch package to have arch specfic subpackages? Wicd is designed as a non-multiarch package, making it noarch won't save space for both repos and end users currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
