https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094415



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3)
> I'm not sure I'm happy with it, but it is the most immutable way.
> 
> As for jj2000, the usual thing we try to do is to get upstream to accept the
> changes if possible so we can use the system version.
form google jj200 site: "The code here originally came from version 5.1 of
JJ2000 as downloaded from this website: http://jpeg2000.epfl.ch/. However, that
code is incomplete, has bugs, has performance issues, and has memory-usage
issues. So a Google Code project was created so that modifications and
improvements could be made." 
More project (e.g. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/tds/ aka thredds aka
netcdf-java submodule grib ) use a proper mod of the same library. your
suggestion s not applicable for various reasons, in addition to those listed in
the upstream site

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to